
Sugar and spice and everything nice?
That’s not what some girls are made of
Most studies about aggressive behavior in
children have focused on boys and on physical expressions of
aggression. “It gave the appearance that girls really were sugar
and spice and everything nice,” says
Nicki Crick, professor of child development. “But I didn’t
believe that was really the case.”
For more than six years, Crick has been
conducting longitudinal studies of relational aggression,
witnessed mainly in girls. Rather than physically harming
others, relationally aggressive children will threaten such
retaliations as: “Do this or I won’t be your friend.” Or: “If
you don’t help me, I’ll tell Amy you said she was ugly.”
“It can look as though girls have happy little
childhoods compared to boys, but I’m pretty sure that’s not
true,” Crick says. “By finding out more about how this form of
aggression works, how it develops, and its underlying causes, we
could create a huge opportunity for intervention and prevention
that could make childhood a truly happier time for girls and
boys, both.”
How the research on relational aggression works
Crick began one of her studies with a group of
third-graders. They are now in middle school and Crick hopes to
continue working with the same group through adolescence and
young adulthood.
“I am interested in following this group and
seeing how early behaviors might be related to such things as
later substance abuse, teen pregnancy, problematic eating
patterns, school dropout rates, and delinquent behavior,” she
says. “This field is wide open. There is so much we don’t know
that we need to know to better help these kids.”
In 2001 Crick initiated another longitudinal
study, this time with young children in preschool. She hopes to
follow them as they make the transition to elementary school to
increase our understanding of the early development of
relational aggression.
What the research shows
Some of Crick’s early research findings show
relational aggression is related to factors such as particular
types of family relationships and relationships with friends and
other peers. She is especially interested in children whose
aggression is gender-atypical—that is, girls who are physically
aggressive and boys who are relationally aggressive.
“These kids seem to be the most at-risk for more
serious social problems later in life,” she says. “The most
apparent reason is that not only does their aggressive behavior
make them less popular, but the fact that they’re perceived by
their peers as acting inappropriately for their gender further
isolates them.”
What others say about this research
“Nicki has made an enormous contribution to our
understanding of aggressive behavior by girls,” says Kenneth
Dodge, professor of public policy studies at Duke
University. “She has reshaped the field by forcing us to
re-think the incorrect stereotype that girls are not aggressive.
She has described aggressive behavior that is directed toward
the destruction of a peer’s social relationships, and she has
shown that girls display this pattern more frequently than boys
do. The life course, antecedents, and psychological mechanisms
of this behavior are similar to those of overt physical
aggression, which is more typically displayed by boys. Nicki is
the leader in our understanding of girls’ aggression.”
William Bukowski, psychology professor at
Concordia University, says, “Nicki Crick’s research on the
variety of forms that aggressive behavior can take has expanded
our understanding of the functioning of the peer group and of
the differential means by which boys and girls can hurt and be
hurt by each other. By providing convincing evidence that boys
and girls engage in different forms of aggression Dr. Crick has
truly changed the scope of research on peer relations and opened
new windows for the understanding of social development in
girls.”
Carol Dweck, psychology professor at
Columbia University, says Crick’s work “has completely changed
the field of aggression from an exclusive emphasis on boys and
physical aggression. The field now takes seriously the fact that
girls can have a problem with aggression and that aggression can
involve an assault on other children’s relationships.
“The most exciting thing, conceptually, is that
girls’ ‘relational’ aggression shares a number of key
characteristics with boys’ physical aggression. Both are linked
to a hostile attributional bias (the tendency to over-perceive
hostile intent in others’ behavior) and to a similar array of
problems in adjustment and social relations. This is
developmental research at its best, with the power to shape the
way scholars think and the power to change children’s lives.”
“Nicki Crick’s research has revolutionized the
field’s understanding of sex differences in psychopathology,”
says Dante Cicchetti, director of the Mt. Hope Center at the
University of Rochester. “In a series of creative and rigorous
studies, she has taught us that girls also experience adjustment
difficulties in childhood. Nicki’s work demonstrates that girls
manifest an array of mental health problems in childhood,
including those of an externalizing nature (e.g., relational
aggression).
“Nicki’s research findings suggest that
epidemiological findings may be a vast underestimate of the
amount of psychopathology in girls. Likewise, there is much that
remains to be discussed concerning pathways to adaptation in
girls. As our knowledge in the area of gender and
psychopathology continues to expand, as I am certain it will
under Nicki’s leadership, there will be implications for
preventing adjustment difficulties in children of both genders.”
Why this research matters
Just as fights among boys can lead to a “boys
will be boys” response from adults, girls who are mean to one
another can lead to adults saying, “That’s just how girls are.”
And while Crick recognizes that almost all children are cruel to
one another on occasion, she emphasizes that some children are
at the extreme edge of such behavior and need help.
“My hope and goal with this research is that
people who interact with children and adolescents will come to
understand how detrimental and harmful this kind of behavior is,
take it seriously, support the kids who are victims of it, and
help those kids who are perpetrating it,” Crick says.
December 2002
Bookmark this
del.icio.us
Furl
Google
Netscape
reddit
Simpy
Spurl
StumbleUpon
Yahoo MyWeb |