Skip to main contentUniversity of Minnesota

Center for Early Education and Development

 

CEED logo

About CEED

Projects

Publications

Professional Development

Events

Partners & Links
 



 

Fact Find

   1990 issue (3rd of 4 issues)
 

In this issue:

Child Abuse Treatment

Preventing Child Abuse:
Is Treatment Too Late?

by Erna Fishhaut

National Studies About Effective Treatment

  • Between 1974 and 1984 the US government funded four major studies about the effective treatment of child abuse and neglect.
     
  • 89 different treatment programs were evaluated.
     
  • Data on 3,253 families experiencing abuse and neglect were gathered.

The collective results provide useful and positive program guidelines:

  • There is a need to differentiate among different types of maltreatment when determining treatment methods.
     
  • It is imperative to expand intervention programs to include direct services to both adults and children.

Need for Comprehensive Services

Findings of the four studies indicate:

Successful intervention with maltreating families requires a comprehensive package of services which address the needs of all family members.

Programs which provided services such as lay counseling and Parents Anonymous as part of the treatment package had more positive out comes.

Supplemental services such as group therapy and parenting education classes also produced significant effects, particularly for the physical abuser.

The studies report greater success with clients experiencing difficulty with sexual abuse than other forms of maltreatment.

It must be noted that providing paraprofessional services requires intensive on-the-job training and ongoing professional backup and supervision for the lay personnel.

Major conclusions of the studies:

Strategies which rely upon costly professional therapy, without augmenting services with group counseling and other supportive and/or remedial services to children and families, offer less opportunity for client gains.

Expansion beyond a strictly therapeutic or counseling service model was not only beneficial to the clients, but was cost-effective.

Length of Treatment  

Findings from evaluation of the length of treatment time were:

  • At least 6 months of treatment was necessary.
  • Clients who had treatment for less than 6 months were less likely to make progress in treatment or to demonstrate a reduced propensity toward future maltreatment.
  • Treatment lasting longer than 18 months did not produce significant changes after the first 18 months.
  • Optimal treatment period may be between 7 and 18 months.

Cause for Concern

Overall, the studies show that 1/3 or more of the parents served by these intensive demonstration efforts maltreated their children while in treatment, and over 1/2 of the families served continued to be judged by staff as likely to mistreat their children following termination.

Conclusions:

Treatment efforts in general are not very successful. Child abuse and neglect continue despite early, thoughtful and often expensive intervention. Treatment programs have been relatively ineffective in initially halting abusive and neglectful behavior or in reducing the future likelihood of maltreatment in most of the severe cases of physical abuse, chronic neglect, and emotional maltreatment.

Summary

The performance of families that are agreeable to intervention can be changed overall by a combination of therapeutic and supportive services.

A sizable core of parents appear to remain unchanged by treatment, and their children remain at risk.

Strategies which serve families only after abusive and neglectful patterns have surfaced were found to be severely limited in these national program evaluations, stressing once again the importance of prevention, not cure.

Policy makers should be aware of the diminishing rate of return on services over time and invest the most intensive resources during the early months of treatment, as close to the point of initial referral as possible, in order to successfully engage the family and begin altering behavior.


FACT FIND suggests:

This is one case where research findings can be useful in setting policies.

The results of a decade of evaluative research on treatment programs suggest that putting all resources into intervention, after the fact, does not make sense. Perhaps the solution is prevention--providing comprehensive services to families much earlier--when the risk is apparent, but before abuse or neglect patterns develop.

For additional information call FACT FIND at 625-2898.

The information provided here is based on an article titled IS TREATMENT TOO LATE: WHAT TEN YEARS OF EVALUATIVE RESEARCH TELLS US written by Anne Cohn and Deborah Daro, National Committee for Prevention of Child Abuse and published in the Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect.

 

Fact Find is published by the Center for Early Education and Development (CEED), University of Minnesota, 40 Education Sciences Building, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55455

ceed@umn.edu (email)
http://cehd.umn.edu/ceed (Web)

CEED provides information regarding young children (birth to age eight), including children with special needs, in the areas of education, child care, child development, and family education. CEED activities include research, training, and publications geared toward improving professional practices, supporting parents, and informing policy development.

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity employer and educator. The College of Education and Human Development is committed to recruiting, enrolling, and education a diverse population of students who represent the overall composition of our society. This publication is available in alternate formats upon request.

Copyright © 2004 by Center for Early Education and Development

These materials may be freely reproduced for education/training or related activities. There is no requirement to obtain special permission for such uses. We do, however, ask that the following citation appear on all reproductions:

Reprinted with permission of the Center for Early Education and Development (CEED), College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, 40 Education Sciences Building, 56 East River Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455-0223; phone: 612-625-2898; fax: 612-625-6619; e-mail: ceed@umn.edu, web site: http://cehd.umn.edu/ceed.



Index Search this site Join our mailing list CEED

The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.