Skip Navigation
  NCEO Logo    
   
 
 

 

 

Special Topic Area:
Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities

>Introduction
>Frequently Asked Questions
>State Alternate Assessment Policies
>Publications and Other Resources
>State Technical Manual Forum: Alternate Assessments for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

Publications and Other Resources

Department of Education Resources:

Federal Register April 9, 2007 Regulations: Title I—Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged; Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA); Final Rule

Fact Sheet: Measuring the Achievement of Students with Disabilities What families and schools need to know about modified academic achievement standards

Non-Regulatory Guidance: Modified Academic Achievement Standards-Draft

 

AA-MAS
Alternate Assessments Based on Modified Academic Achievement Standards (AA-MAS)


Related NCEO Publications:

Online resources available at NCEO's Web site (the publications are listed chronologically, with the most recent first; Policy Directions will give a general overview of the issues with other publications providing greater depth):

For additional online resources on the NCEO Web site, see the State Technical Manual Forum: Alternate Assessments for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

For reports before 2000, see NCEO's Online Publications.

Other Online resources:

Developing Alternate Assessment Technical Adequacy, a project that supports states in developing technically adequate alternate assessments for students with significant disabilities. Also see DAATA newsletters at http://www.daata.org/OtherDocs.html.

National Alternate Assessment Center. Also see the NAAC October 2006 Newsletter at http://www.naacpartners.org/newsletters/Research%20Notes%2010-3-06.pdf.

Additional resources:

Browder, D. M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: The Guilford Press.

Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (2003). Understanding the purpose and process of alternate assessment. In D. Ryndak & S. Alper (eds.). Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Burdette, P. (2001). Alternate assessment: Early highlights and pitfalls of reporting. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26 (2), 61-66.

Burdette, P. J., & Olsen, K. (2000, July). Alternate assessments: A medley of alternate assessments. Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center, University of Kentucky. Retrieved June 19, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/msrrc/Publications/alternate_alternates1.htm

Development of alternate assessment. (1998, November). Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center, University of Kentucky. Retrieved June 19, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/msrrc/Publications/devaltass.htm.

Elliott, J. L., & Thurlow, M. L. (2005). Improving test performance of students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Kearns, J. F., Kleinert, H. L., & Clayton, J. (1998). Principal supports for inclusive assessment: A Kentucky story. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31 (2), pp. 16-23.

Kleinert, H. L. (2001). An introduction to alternate assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26 (2), 57-60.

Kleinert, H., Green, P., Hurte, M., Clayton, J., & Oetinger, C (2002). Creating and using meaningful alternate assessments. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, (4) 40-47.

Kleinert, H. L., & Kearns, J. F. (2001). Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities.   Baltimore, Maryland: Brookes Publishing.

Kleinert, H. L., Kearns, J. F., & Kennedy, S. (1997). Accountability for all students: Kentucky’s alternate portfolio assessment for students with moderate and severe cognitive disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 22, pp. 88-101.

Kleinert, H. L., Kennedy, S., & Kearns, J. F. (1999). The impact of alternate assessments: A statewide teacher survey. The Journal of Special Education, 32 (2), pp. 93-102.

McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Olsen, K. (1999, May). What principles are driving development of state alternate assessments? Lexington, KY: Mid-South Regional Resource Center, University of Kentucky. Retrieved June 19, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ihdi.uky.edu/msrrc/Publications/whatprincip.htm.

Olson, J. F., Bond, L., & Andrews, C. (1999). Annual survey of state student assessment programs. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Ryndak, D., & Alper, S. (Eds.). (2003). Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Thompson, S. J., & Quenemoen, R. F. (2001). Eight steps to effective implementation of alternate assessments. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26 (2), 67-74.

Thompson, S. J., Quenemoen, R. F., & Thurlow, M. L. (2001). Alternate assessments: Measuring what ALL students have learned. Communique, 30 (3), 12-14.

Thompson, S., Quenemoen, R., Thurlow, M., & Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Alternate assessments for students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. For ordering information, see http://www.corwinpress.com/.

Thurlow, M. L., Elliott, J. L., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2003). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

About NCEO | Publications | Special Topics | Projects | Presentations | State Policies | Accommodations Bibliography | Teleconferences | Tools | Related Sites

College of Education and Human Development logo

NCEO is supported primarily through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G050007) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. Additional support for targeted projects, including those on LEP students, is provided by other federal and state agencies. Opinions expressed in this Web site do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it.

© 2007 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Online Privacy Statement
This page was last updated on April 02, 2008