Special Topic Area:
Out-of-Level Testing for Students with Disabilities

Publications and Other Out-of-Level Testing Resources

Online resources available at NCEO's Web site (the publications are listed chronologically, with the most recent first; Policy Directions will give a general overview of the issues with other publications providing greater depth):

• States' Procedures for Ensuring Out-of-Level Test Instrument Quality (Out-of Level Testing Report 14) / PDF Version
• Rapid Changes, Repeated Challenges: States' Out-of-Level Testing Policies for 2003-2004 (Out-of-Level Testing Report 13) / PDF Version
• Understanding Out-of-Level Testing in Local Schools: A First Case Study of Policy Implementation and Effects (Out-of-Level Testing Report 11) / PDF Version
• 2003 State Special Education Outcomes: Marching On / PDF format
• Reporting Out-of-Level Test Scores: Are These Students Included in Accountability Programs? (Out-of-Level Testing Report #10) / PDF Version
• Testing Students with Disabilities Out of Level: State Prevalence and Performance Results (Out-of-Level Testing Report #9) / PDF Version
• 2001 State Special Education Outcomes: A Report on State Activities at the Beginning of a New Decade
• Scale Score Comparability Across Two Levels of a Norm-Referenced Math Computation Test for Students with Learning Disabilities (Out-of-Level Testing Report #8)
• A Follow-up Web-based Survey: Test and Measurement Expert Opinions on the Psychometric Properties of Out-of-Level Tests (Out-of-Level Testing Report #7)
• Test and Measurement Expert Opinions: A Dialogue About Testing Students with Disabilities Out of Level in Large-Scale Assessments (Out-of-Level Testing Report #6)
• Testing Students Out of Level in Large-Scale Assessments: What States Perceive and Believe (Out-of-Level Testing Report 5 / 2001)
• A Review of Out-of-Level Testing State Policies (Out-of-Level Testing Report 4 / 2001)
• Test Publishers’ Views on Out-of-Level Testing (Out-of-Level Testing Report 3 / 2000).
• How Out-of-Level Testing Affects the Psychometric Quality of Test Scores (Out-of-Level Testing Report 2 / 2000)
• Past and Present Understandings of Out-of-Level Testing: A Research Synthesis (Out-of-Level Testing Report 1 / 2000)
• Out-of-Level Testing: Pros and Cons (Policy Directions 9 / 1999)
• 1997 State Special Education Outcomes: A Report on State Activities During Educational Reform (1997)
  Please Note: This is a PDF file can only be read by Adobe Acrobat Reader.  (Some figures are not included in the online document.)

Additional Resources

Doscher, M., & Bruno, J. E. (1981). Simulation of inner-city standardized testing behavior: Implications for instructional evaluation. American Educational Research Journal, 18 (4), 475-489.

Plake, B. S., & Hoover, H. D. (1979). The comparability of equal raw scores obtained from in-level and out-of-level testing: One source of the discrepancy between in-level and out-of-level grade equivalent scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16 (4), 271-278.

Smith, L. L., & Johns, J. L. (1984). A study of the effects of out-of-level testing with poor readers in the intermediate grades. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly (5), 139-143.

Wheeler, P. H. (1995). Functional-level testing: A must for valid and accurate assessment results. (EREAPA Publication Series No. 95-2). Livermore, CA: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 393 915).

Wick, J. W. (1983). Reducing proportion of chance scores in inner-city standardized testing results: Impact on average scores. American Educational Research Journal, 20 (3), 461-463.

Top of page

NCEO is supported primarily through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G050007) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. Additional support for targeted projects, including those on LEP students, is provided by other federal and state agencies. Opinions expressed in this Web site do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it.

© 2007 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Online Privacy Statement
This page was last updated on April 02, 2008